Back to Goldwater Republicans
Rate Back to Goldwater Republicans :
9 rating(s)



Created: October 26, 2009

Categories:
Misc

Photos
Loading...
Videos
Loading...
Members: 147
Loading...


Comments: 11
Loading...


Back to Goldwater Republicans
Loading...

For all true conservative republicans who follow the late, great Barry Goldwater's teachings, Mr.Conservative. "Remember that a government big enough to give you everything you want is also big enough to take away everything you have." - Barry Goldwater

Activities:

(K. McCowen)
K. McCowen
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 22:54
"I enjoyed reading Mr.Goldwater's book, the conscience of a conservative. Goldwater should have been President!"

(MARY JARRARD)
MARY JARRARD
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Sunday, 08 November 2009 01:14
"Let see, the plan was to not vote yes on Pelosi health care bill. The Stupack-blue dogs would not vote yes on Pelosi bill unless his amendment passed. So what do you republican do you vote for his amendment so that they can vote yes. Brilliant As far as I am concerned you republicans actual voted for the bill before you, voted against it. Why did you not just vote PRESENT on Stupack? I really want an answer. Mary in Kansas."

(Diane Lorbiecki)
Diane Lorbiecki
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Saturday, 07 November 2009 04:20
"I, like many others, find Ronald Reagan to be a complete mystery. I remember seeing a video of "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America" author, Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt [who worked in President Reagan's Department of Education, which was SUPPOSED to have been disbanded under his leadership (but never was)], discussing how, before he was elected, the Californians who really knew him best, were warning people that he was not a true conservative -- or at least he didn't act as a true conservative while he was governor of California. Why did he pick the despised (by rabid Reagan supporters) George H. W. Bush, of all people, as his running mate? At the time, we Reagan fans believed he picked Bush to "bring the party together" in order to win more easily -- but once Reagan was elected, we believed he would be a real Goldwater-conservative president. But why, then, was Reagan's administration, filled with "CFR types?" When it comes right down to it, it seems very few people understood the real Ronald Reagan. Even Reagan's "official biographer," Edmund Morris, who had generous access to President Reagan, found him inscrutable. From CBS News: “He was truly one of the strangest men who’s ever lived,” says Morris. “Nobody around him understood him. I, every person I interviewed, almost without exception, eventually would say, ‘You know, I could never really figure him out.’” http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/06/09/60II/main622051.shtml Did Ronald Reagan's administration, then (and the subsequent Bush Dynasty that sprang from this administration), send us spiraling away from what we THOUGHT would be Goldwater conservatism?"

(James Carroll)
Created a blog entry Return to Barry?
on Friday, 06 November 2009 18:28
" Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 ... "

(Diane Lorbiecki)
Diane Lorbiecki
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Wednesday, 04 November 2009 04:16
"Senator Barry Goldwater wrote (in 1979): "David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski found Jimmy Carter to be an ideal candidate, for example. They helped him to win the Democratic nomination and the presidency. To accomplish their purpose, they mobilized the money power of the Wall Street bankers, the intellectual influence of the academic community - which is subservient to the wealthy of the great tax-free foundations - and the media controllers represented in the membership of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission." Has history repeated itself more than thirty years later - with our current president in the "Jimmy Carter" role, but with both David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski as the same puppeteers?"

(Ryan-O)
Ryan-O
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Wednesday, 04 November 2009 00:17
"That's a great quote Nelson. Thank you for posting that. I love it when people asked Ron Paul what he would do as president, and he would instead list what he wouldn't do. Makes me proud."

(Thomas Paine)
Thomas Paine
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Tuesday, 03 November 2009 14:34
"Many of the Ron Paul supporters are Goldwater quoters. Our goals are virtually the same."

(Richard Massafra)
Richard Massafra
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Monday, 02 November 2009 21:56
"Which law is not a moral law?"

(Nelson Winters)
Nelson Winters
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Monday, 02 November 2009 16:48
"The quote in the description is actually from Gerald Ford, not Goldwater. Although a little long, my vote for an actual quote from Goldwater is: "I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution ... or have failed their purpose... or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is 'needed' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should be attacked for neglecting my constituents' 'interests,' I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty, and in that cause I am doing the very best I can.""

(Jon Spurgin)
Commented on Berry said it... What do YOU think?
on Monday, 02 November 2009 15:50
"Barry is Absolutely Right!Richard – unalienable rights aren’t a moral code. The right to free speech has nothing to do with morality, its more along the lines of having a right to state your opinion even if someone else or the government disagrees.Laws should NOT be about morals. Although it seems the majority of the people have fallen on this slippery slope. The 1 function of any Law should be to protecting our Rights - that is all. Once we start legislating morality we transfer the decision making of moral judgments from the individual to the gov. And now we all have to live by the same moral judgments decided upon by beurocrats (just what we all want right!). Yes, we can still make our own moral judgments, but if our moral judgments fall outside the bounds of the governments we can be forcibly punished – which brings me to why legislating morality is immoral in the first place. Is it ok for me, if I see someone doing something that I don’t morally agree with, to take a gun, use that gun to force them to stop, and lock them in my basement for a pre-determined amount of time? No, but that is the method of coercion that the government uses. Therefore by legislating morality we are basically outsourcing violent coercion, which, so long as our rights have not been infringed upon, most would agree is immoral. Look up coercion and tell me if that is moral."

(Marc Knauss)
Commented on Berry said it... What do YOU think?
on Monday, 02 November 2009 13:46
"My dad and I get into this debate often. As a Christian and a Libertarian how do I reconcile voting for candidates who are at odds with Biblical Teaching...my thoughts on it go along the lines of God giving to man the rights to live a life free of control by a dictator-like God. He gave us absolute freedom to decide how we live our lives, in the Old Testament the religious class tried to regulate morals on the Israelite people and it ended up being a mess. "Religion" is about regulations and humans trying to control other humans through moral standards. Faith, Salvation and a Christian life are brought about by a personal understanding that we are responsible to ourselves and to God for our actions, not to a regulating body."

(Michael Maresco)
Michael Maresco
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Monday, 02 November 2009 13:35
"There is a slate of Goldwater style republicans being promoted on http://thisnovember5th.com - check it out"

(Richard Massafra)
Commented on Berry said it... What do YOU think?
on Saturday, 31 October 2009 02:42
"Aren't our unalienable rights a moral code given to us by God? If we shouldn't force our moral codes on society then we would have no laws. We would have chaos. Moral codes such as no cigarette sales to anyone under 18 or alcohol to folks under 21, or driving until 16 all force our morals on society. Other laws such as prospectus disclosures for investors, limits on interest rates, pollution laws are all moral codes. Until we get the understanding that law making is about morals we will loose the cultural war. We will end up with wacky liberal ideas like cap and tax and universal health care and corruption and bigger government and more debt and sitting on the natural resources that we have and higher taxes and a continuing decline in our standard of living."

(James Carroll)
Commented on Berry said it... What do YOU think?
on Friday, 30 October 2009 19:32
"It is not my right to change others morals, or keep them in line with "traditional christian values". Personally, I think the freedom of religion also permits you to have whatever morals you would like, and if you want pornography or to live as a gay person it is your right. But there are some lines, such as calling it "marriage" , etc... "

(Parker Conley)
Commented on Berry said it... What do YOU think?
on Thursday, 29 October 2009 18:44
"i am also a christian and go to church but i have to say goldwater was completely right. social "conservatives" are NOT conservtives at all. all they do is push their big government agenda in the name of Christianity. The government should not get involved in religious matters and vice versa. personal liberty is something Christians should embrace and not be restricting other peoples liberties when they interfere in government. like goldwater said, "all good christians should kick jerry falwell in the a$$" :)"

(WeThePeopleAreComing)
Commented on Berry said it... What do YOU think?
on Thursday, 29 October 2009 13:32
"I will answer your question with a question...even though I hate when people do that :)Where does one draw the line between being a Conservative and being a Christian? Where do we, as a society, derive our moral standards for governing this nation?"

(James Carroll)
James Carroll
Wrote a comment on Back to Goldwater Republicans
on Thursday, 29 October 2009 13:23
"I agree. Reagan did move away from Goldwater's theories. And we do need to return to our roots...Thanks for joining. -James"

(James Carroll)
Created a blog entry Berry said it... What do YOU think?
on Thursday, 29 October 2009 13:20
" "Mark my word - if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Poli... "